What is patriarchy?
Where it came from, who it serves, and what it costs
"Patriarchy" shows up in academic papers, political arguments and comment sections. It's used so often, and for so many things, that its meaning can get lost. This post covers what the word means, where the system likely came from, and how it has helped and hurt different groups of people.
What does "patriarchy" mean?
The word comes from the Greek patriarkhēs, meaning "father who rules," from patēr (father) and arkhē (rule).
It originally meant something narrow: the male head of a family or clan, like the biblical patriarchs Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. In that sense it described a household where the eldest man had authority over his wife, children, servants and property.
Today the word usually means something broader: a social system in which men hold most of the power in political leadership, moral authority, social privilege and control of property, and in which that power is passed down through male lines.
Sociologist Sylvia Walby, for example, describes patriarchy as working across several areas at once: the household, paid work, the state, culture, sexuality and violence.
It helps to separate patriarchy from two things people often confuse it with:
- It isn't a conspiracy. Most scholars describe it as a set of norms, laws and expectations that people inherit and repeat, usually without thinking about it.
- It isn't the same as "men." Women can uphold patriarchal norms, and men can reject them. The term describes a structure, not a group of people.
Where did it come from?
Nobody knows for certain, and scholars still argue about it. Most agree on one starting point: patriarchy has not always existed. Most researchers think it emerged over time.
Before agriculture
For most of human history, people lived in small hunter-gatherer bands. Studies of modern hunter-gatherer groups, such as the BaYaka of Congo and the Agta of the Philippines, find relatively equal relationships between the sexes. Both men and women influence where the group lives and who it lives with. Many anthropologists think early human societies were similar. They weren't perfectly equal, but they lacked rigid, formal male dominance.
The turn to farming (about 10,000 years ago)
Many theories point to the shift to farming and settled life. Several explanations overlap:
- Property and inheritance. Once people had land, herds and stored grain, they had wealth to pass on. Friedrich Engels argued in The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State (1884) that men's wish to pass property to their own children led to control over women's sexuality and reproduction.
- The plough. Economists Alberto Alesina, Paola Giuliano and Nathan Nunn found that societies whose ancestors farmed with the plough still have less equal attitudes about gender today. Ploughing takes a lot of upper-body strength, so it favored men's labor in the fields and pushed women toward domestic work.
- Warfare and the state. As settlements grew and competed for resources, organized warfare became more important. Societies that valued warriors tended to give more status to men.
The first written evidence (about 3000 to 600 BCE)
In The Creation of Patriarchy (1986), historian Gerda Lerner traces how male dominance was written into law and religion in ancient Mesopotamia over about 2,500 years:
- The Code of Hammurabi (about 1754 BCE) treated wives and children partly as property. In some cases a man could pledge them to pay off his debts.
- The Middle Assyrian Laws (about 1075 BCE) required "respectable" married women to wear veils and banned enslaved women and prostitutes from wearing them. The law classified women by their sexual relationship to men.
- Religious traditions increasingly gave the highest divine authority to male gods.
Later examples
Many later systems built on the same pattern. In Roman law, the paterfamilias held legal power over his household. Under the English common-law doctrine of coverture, a married woman's legal identity was absorbed into her husband's. In much of the world, women were barred from voting, owning property or entering professions until the 19th and 20th centuries.
Other views
Some thinkers argue that patriarchy rests mainly on biology. They point to average differences between the sexes in physical strength and aggression, and to the demands of pregnancy and nursing. Sociologist Steven Goldberg made this case in The Inevitability of Patriarchy (1973).
Most anthropologists and historians answer that biology may explain some division of labor, but it doesn't explain the huge variation between societies. It also doesn't explain how quickly gender roles have changed in the last 150 years.
How patriarchy "helps"
Asking who a system benefits is a fair question. It explains why systems last.
For men as a group, patriarchy has historically given:
- Greater access to political power, wealth, education and property
- Legal authority over family decisions, including marriage, finances and children
- More social freedom, such as freedom of movement, sexual freedom with less stigma, and public visibility
- Women's unpaid labor in housework, childcare and emotional care
Arguments made in its favor. Defenders, historically and today, have argued that clear, fixed roles gave stability and predictability. They say it made inheritance and family obligations clear, and that it placed duties of protection and provision on men. Some people find meaning and security in traditional roles and choose them freely. Whatever you conclude, these arguments help explain why patriarchal arrangements lasted so long. They weren't kept in place by force alone.
The benefits weren't shared equally among men, though. Class, race, caste and sexuality all decided which men gained from the system. Enslaved men, poor laborers and gay men often gained little.
How patriarchy hurts
Harms to women
- Legal and political exclusion. In many places women couldn't vote, own property, sign contracts or get divorced. In some countries they still face legal limits.
- Economic disadvantage. Women face pay gaps, are kept out of certain jobs, and do most unpaid care work, which leaves them with less economic independence.
- Violence. Domestic violence, sexual violence, "honor"-based violence and child marriage are tied to beliefs that men control women's bodies and behavior.
- Health and education. Some regions still show sex-selective abortion and less investment in girls' schooling, and medical research has long treated the male body as the default.
- Narrowed lives. Many women have had their ambitions, voices and choices limited by expectations about what women "should" be.
Harms to men
People sometimes overlook this side, but many scholars stress it. Writer bell hooks argued in The Will to Change (2004) that patriarchy damages men too:
- Emotional suppression. Expectations like "boys don't cry" discourage men from showing vulnerability or asking for help. This is linked to men's much higher suicide rates in many countries.
- Pressure to provide and protect. Men are often valued for income and toughness. They do most of the dangerous work, die more often on the job, and have historically been the ones conscripted into war.
- Rigid masculinity. Men who don't fit the mold, including gay, gentle or non-traditional men, often face ridicule or violence.
- Fatherhood. Defining men as providers rather than caregivers has distanced many fathers from their children, and has sometimes worked against men in custody disputes.
Harms to society
When half the population is kept out of leadership, education or the economy, a society loses talent, ideas and productivity. Economists find that more gender equality is linked to stronger economic growth and better health outcomes.
Where we are now
Patriarchy has weakened a lot in many parts of the world over the last century and a half. Women gained the vote, entered universities and professions, and won legal equality in marriage and work. But change is uneven. In some places patriarchal laws are still in force. Elsewhere, informal norms remain in pay gaps, in who does the housework, and in who holds the most powerful positions.
Understanding patriarchy doesn't mean blaming any one person. It means seeing that the rules we inherit were made by people, in particular times and places, for particular reasons. Because people made them, people can examine them, keep what serves everyone, and change what doesn't.
Further reading
- Gerda Lerner, The Creation of Patriarchy (1986)
- bell hooks, The Will to Change: Men, Masculinity, and Love (2004)
- Friedrich Engels, The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State (1884)
- Sylvia Walby, Theorizing Patriarchy (1990)
- Alberto Alesina, Paola Giuliano and Nathan Nunn, "On the Origins of Gender Roles: Women and the Plough," Quarterly Journal of Economics (2013)
